Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240326
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 04 '24 at 10:16
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$195
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 70.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 880
82% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,325
82% 1,325 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$280
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 117
Parallax 156
136% 147 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
116% 147 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 1TB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM32.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 943 672 730 730 800 779 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,274
Write 1,858
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 776
305% 1,349 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 47.5
172% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 693
537% 741 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 185%
Great: 287%
Fanxiang S500PRO 1TB
700GB free
Firmware: SN07939
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1922 1773 1754 1766 1515 1179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,452
Write 1,890
Mixed 1,612
SusWrite 1,651
374% 1,651 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 56
197% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 575
DQ Mixed 734
549% 737 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 252%
Great: 343%
Emtec X200 256GB
101GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.1% Very poor
Read 41.1
Write 41.7
Mixed 36.1
SusWrite 42
9% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 9.8
34% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 26.5
DQ Mixed 20.3
17% 25.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 71%
Sabrent Disk Device 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 89 119 118 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 167
Write 173
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 113
167% 128 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
161% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 59%
Great: 85%
Sabrent Disk Device 10TB
8.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 93 110 118 119 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 222
Write 220
Mixed 129
SusWrite 102
218% 168 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.7
222% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 107%
Sabrent Disk Device 129,986.5TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 55 9 0 0 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 214
Write 122
Mixed 117
SusWrite 21.9
140% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
163% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C18 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 45.4
MC Mixed 25.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 9.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 27" 1920 1057 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback