Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UM5606WA
Memory15.7 GB free of 24 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '24 at 04:46
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 365
FP8LPDDR5x, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 59.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 264
82% 156 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 642
69% 547 Pts
64-Core 1,126
70% 1,126 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 880M
Asus(1043 1DF3) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.16.06
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 48.3
26% 38.3 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 55.6
35% 41 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 58%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA1T0QFM-1BD1AABGB 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,172
Write 1,505
Mixed 1,138
285% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 24
101% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 652
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 502
351% 453 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 330%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1536M32D4DS-026 4x6GB
4 of 4 slots used
24GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 71.9
MC Write 66.7
MC Mixed 62.6
192% 67.1 GB/s
SC Read 42.7
SC Write 81.5
SC Mixed 58
174% 60.7 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 182%
Great: 195%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 120 16" 1280 720 SDC41AF
Typical ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus ASUS Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA_UM5606WA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback