Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS Vivobook S 15 M5506UA_M5506UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS Vivobook S 15 M5506UA_M5506UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M5506UA
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240424
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 08 '24 at 12:46
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 64.2
1-Core 145
2-Core 256
83% 155 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 830
80% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,467
91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Asus(1043 3728) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.52
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.6% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 70.8
43% 50 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 55.6
Splatting 77.8
47% 54.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA1T0QFM-1BD1AABGB 1TB
863GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2671 2266 2617 2865 2884 2883 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 1,795
Write 2,731
Mixed 1,642
SusWrite 2,698
503% 2,216 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 33.6
155% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,398
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 1,081
803% 1,079 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 330%
Great: 330%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 54.3
MC Mixed 44.3
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 42.2
SC Write 51.4
SC Mixed 51.2
138% 48.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 134%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 1R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 13% 75 206 56 120 15.5" 1280 720 SDC416E
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback