Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 20:02
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D-$196
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 5.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 98.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 297
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 131
48% 299 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$281
Asus(1043 881E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 116
Parallax 120
105% 122 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 104
Splatting 86.7
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2084 787 777 808 802 803 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,668
Write 2457
Mixed 1,849
SusWrite 1,010
446% 1,996 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 92.3
316% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,149
865% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 318%
Great: 346%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1988 968 806 806 807 806 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 2,576
Write 2,222
Mixed 1,837
SusWrite 1030
428% 1,916 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 91
304% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 1,109
DQ Mixed 1,150
867% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 312%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 31.6
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 38.4
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 46.5
86% 46.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 47 144 23.8" 1920 1080 GSM5C19 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $371WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback