Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics208% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO6100
Memory50.5 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 14 '24 at 06:33
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 74.2
1-Core 224
2-Core 430
124% 243 Pts
4-Core 821
8-Core 1,495
139% 1,158 Pts
64-Core 3,122
193% 3,122 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 114%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 300A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5612
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
208% Outstanding
Lighting 300
Reflection 243
Parallax 302
244% 281 fps
MRender 341
Gravity 261
Splatting 212
215% 271 fps
Poor: 144%
This bench: 208%
Great: 243%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HDLB-00B07 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7801Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,696
Write 3,030
Mixed 2,787
636% 2,838 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 94.6
306% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,603
DQ Write 1,196
DQ Mixed 1,354
1,024% 1,384 MB/s
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: GXB7801Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,682
Write 3,042
Mixed 2,800
637% 2,841 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 100
327% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,763
DQ Write 1,323
DQ Mixed 1,482
1,125% 1,523 MB/s
Poor: 225% Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88AGBSA092N 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 44.3
126% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 183%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 120 16" 1920 1200 BOE0B90
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0510 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 237%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback