Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17M1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GS76 Stealth 11UH
MotherboardMSI MS-17M1  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '23 at 14:21
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 43
1-Core 120
2-Core 217
66% 127 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 733
73% 594 Pts
64-Core 1,015
63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 64%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.06% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 30
Parallax 10.5
8% 16.6 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 9.7
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.06%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 1222 1179 1159 1145 1114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,940
Write 1,934
Mixed 1,446
SusWrite 1,150
363% 1,618 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 46.7
161% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 592
443% 602 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 225%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.2% Good
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 21.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 9.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17M1 Builds (Compare 919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17M1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback