Today's hottest deals

Insyde AlderLake

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemInsyde AlderLake  (all builds)
MotherboardOnLogic K800-A01-P
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '24 at 14:46
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i9-12900TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 192
2-Core 377
112% 216 Pts
4-Core 694
8-Core 1,307
119% 1,000 Pts
64-Core 1272
79% 1272 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 98.3
Parallax 87.8
71% 91.2 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 80.9
72% 88.7 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTE652T-I 512GB
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52B9T7OA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 275 238 240 239 239 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
221% Outstanding
Read 1,695
Write 859
Mixed 957
SusWrite 269
209% 945 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 87.7
336% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 632
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 266
340% 598 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 221%
Great: 221%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
InnoDisk Corporation M4S0-AGS1O5IK 1x16GB
1 of 3 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 22 216 57 60 24" 1920 1017 AOC0001 2460
Typical AlderLake Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Insyde AlderLake

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback