Today's hottest deals

Aaeon FLO-CPC01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is relative performance (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAaeon FLO-CPC01  (all builds)
MotherboardAAEON FLO-CPC01
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 18:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Relative performance (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i9-12900TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
Memory 40.5
1-Core 9.7
2-Core 55.7
22% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 361
29% 254 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Device(13FE 00C7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.96
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.1% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 76
Parallax 72.6
54% 71.7 fps
MRender 83.3
Gravity 62
Splatting 65.1
57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTE710T 512GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82B0U9MM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 265 195 260 231 329 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 1,206
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 259
221% 987 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 15.4
46% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 323
240% 320 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 97%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
InnoDisk Corporation M5S0-BGS2OCVP 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 29.4
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.4
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 7 60 23.8" 1920 1017 HPN3465 HP E243m
Typical FLO-CPC01 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Aaeon FLO-CPC01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback