Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1504FA
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '24 at 02:52
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 59
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 160
51% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 451
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 282D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 11
Parallax 10.9
2% 8.1 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 3.7
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS001TEJ9X108N 1TB
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51002C30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 391 358 366 408 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 487
Write 410
Mixed 417
SusWrite 379
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 15.8
62% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 357
239% 295 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 330%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.8% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504FA_E1504FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback