Today's hottest deals

Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 327%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 385%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics288% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive514% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory52 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231004
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateDec 16 '23 at 20:14
Run Duration365 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$360
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 215
2-Core 430
124% 242 Pts
4-Core 832
8-Core 1,512
141% 1,172 Pts
64-Core 2,876
178% 2,876 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$993
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
288% Outstanding
Lighting 427
Reflection 418
Parallax 442
348% 429 fps
MRender 542
Gravity 374
Splatting 267
308% 395 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 288%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3950 3940 3873 3999 3998 3125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
514% Outstanding
Read 2,944
Write 4,114
Mixed 3,286
SusWrite 3,814
803% 3,539 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 90.4
294% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,902
DQ Write 1,351
DQ Mixed 1,635
1,219% 1,629 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 514%
Great: 587%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3667 4006 4011 4018 4014 3729 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
527% Outstanding
Read 3,016
Write 4,208
Mixed 3,220
SusWrite 3,908
814% 3,588 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 90.1
298% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,969
DQ Write 1,412
DQ Mixed 1,706
1,270% 1,696 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 527%
Great: 587%
HFS001TEJ9X108N 1TB
745GB free
Firmware: 51002C30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1892 1888 1874 1882 1894 1907 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,010
Write 1,908
Mixed 1,667
SusWrite 1,890
421% 1,869 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 40.4
202% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,931
DQ Write 1,452
DQ Mixed 1,297
1,077% 1,560 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 330%
Great: 330%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$319
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 487 485 484 482 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 491
Mixed 434
SusWrite 484
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 53.1
180% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 370
281% 377 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 123%
Great: 128%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$209
5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 174 167 158 167 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 157
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 169
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B6400C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
156% Outstanding
MC Read 59.1
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 53.8
161% 56.2 GB/s
SC Read 51
SC Write 60.6
SC Mixed 51.1
155% 54.2 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 148%
This bench: 156%
Great: 230%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 10G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 33% 54 218 60 144 27" 1280 720 ACR06CF VG270U P
History: Score 38: 0P 3R 4G 11B | Score 48: 0P 5R 5G 8B | Score 55: 0P 5R 10G 0B
Typical ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 404%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback