Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC13ANBi5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC13ANHi5
MotherboardIntel NUC13ANBi5  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '24 at 12:52
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 67.8
1-Core 184
2-Core 372
106% 208 Pts
4-Core 722
8-Core 1,044
110% 883 Pts
64-Core 1,486
92% 1,486 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 3037) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 23.8
17% 23.5 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 30
Splatting 17.9
18% 23.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM7A1 1TB
636GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11778
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2773
Write 2,271
Mixed 1,889
513% 2,311 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 72.6
243% 85 MB/s
DQ Read 894
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 687
496% 653 MB/s
Poor: 265% Great: 502%
Transcend TS4TSSD230S 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 22Z4V55Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 380
Mixed 395
92% 415 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 34.9
117% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 128
151% 262 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 121%
Adata SX 8200PNP 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 642
Write 650
Mixed 92.2
102% 461 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 49.4
158% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 331
240% 309 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 91%
Adata SX 8200PNP 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 3103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 673
Write 639
Mixed 640
145% 651 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 48.1
156% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 323
234% 301 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4S08G32C22ST 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 37
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 24.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5B08 LG Ultra HD
Typical NUC13ANBi5 Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC13ANBi5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback