Today's hottest deals

Asrock X299 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X299 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171002
Uptime12 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 07:36
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$209
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,135
101% 855 Pts
64-Core 2,334
144% 2,334 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
489GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 479 413 342 340 345 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 475
Mixed 443
SusWrite 397
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 57.3
194% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 347
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$254
39GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 784
Write 2,162
Mixed 1,551
341% 1,499 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 55.8
215% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,559
DQ Write 1,333
DQ Mixed 1,429
1,075% 1,440 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 322%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$254
617GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1126 911 875 929 854 632 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,568
Write 2,157
Mixed 1,497
SusWrite 888
345% 1,527 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 53.3
202% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,676
DQ Write 1,391
DQ Mixed 1,518
1,141% 1,528 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 247%
Great: 322%
Adata SX 8200PNP 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 390 390 389 389 373 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 375
Write 381
Mixed 374
SusWrite 387
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 43.9
141% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 200
143% 183 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 91%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
79GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 73.3
Write 70.7
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 53.5
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 64
MC Mixed 45.7
151% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 11.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 130%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 120 0" 1280 720
Typical X299 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $487
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback