GPD G1618-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGPD G1618-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1618-04
Memory5.2 GB free of 16 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 20:53
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 206
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 722
69% 571 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 30
Parallax 59.8
27% 40.8 fps
MRender 31.5
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 20.2
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480Y2D100-1TB 1TB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.5E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 861 156 182 179 201 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,486
Write 2,402
Mixed 1,747
SusWrite 295
335% 1,482 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 58.8
235% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 245
332% 611 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 184%
Great: 339%
Generic MassStorageClass 512GB
131GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 122 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 171
Write 123
Mixed 96
SusWrite 123
166% 128 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 5.1
332% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9JCNNNCP3MLCR-N6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 40
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 29
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5BC1 LG ULTRAFINE
Typical G1618-04 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: GPD G1618-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback