GPD G1618-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGPD G1618-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1618-04
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateJul 19 '23 at 19:49
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 60.9
1-Core 166
2-Core 303
92% 177 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 740
80% 634 Pts
64-Core 965
60% 965 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 45
21% 37.3 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 35.2
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480Y2D100-512G 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.5E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1623 1718 1943 2286 2231 1076 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 1,468
Write 2,341
Mixed 1,600
SusWrite 1,813
410% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 69.2
263% 94.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,040
DQ Write 932
DQ Mixed 253
390% 742 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 294%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9JCNNNCP3MLCR-N6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 30
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 22.4
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 6" 1296 759 GPD0598 G1618-04
Typical G1618-04 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: GPD G1618-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback