Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83EG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83EG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231121
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMay 27 '24 at 05:26
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840H
FP7r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 45.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 216
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 832
75% 632 Pts
64-Core 1,400
87% 1,400 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3D14) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.76.07
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 63.9
30% 38.2 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 69.1
40% 45.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJYJ512MKN1QWY 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2L06A1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,736
Write 2,347
Mixed 1,696
432% 1,926 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 24.7
123% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 839
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 669
543% 768 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3PB0-CWMOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.4
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 18.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 2R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 17% 88 212 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO7EAD
Typical 83EG Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83EG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback