Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83EG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83EG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231028
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateMar 02 '24 at 03:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840H
FP7r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 265
75% 145 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 881
82% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,351
84% 1,351 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3D14) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.05.18
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.2% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 58.5
34% 37.7 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 55.5
Splatting 76.5
43% 48.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJYJ512MKN1QWY 512GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2L06A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1355 1440 1385 1390 792 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,285
Write 1,569
Mixed 1,171
SusWrite 1,106
290% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 26.3
134% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 801
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 664
458% 583 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 182%
Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3PB0-CWMOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.3% Good
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 23.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 0R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 24% 38 213 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 CSW150F
Typical 83EG Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83EG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback