HP Pavilion Laptop 16-ag0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 16-ag0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8CBC
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 19:07
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 53.1
1-Core 193
2-Core 360
102% 202 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 946
96% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,045
65% 1,045 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon TM Graphics
HP(103C 8CBC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.44
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 41.2
19% 29.9 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 52.3
32% 36.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ9X108N 1TB
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1739 1813 1813 2012 2014 2004 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 1,727
Write 2,113
Mixed 1,748
SusWrite 1,899
424% 1,872 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 37.4
175% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,363
DQ Write 976
DQ Mixed 1,252
913% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 289%
Great: 398%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069N 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 49.9
MC Mixed 44.5
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 42.3
105% 36.7 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 16" 1280 720 BOE0C4C
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback