One-netbook ONEXPLAYER 2 PRO ARP23H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemOne-netbook ONEXPLAYER 2 PRO ARP23H  (all builds)
MotherboardONE-NETBOOK ONEXPLAYER 2 PRO ARP23P
Memory18.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240326
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 02 '24 at 09:45
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 61
1-Core 196
2-Core 375
107% 211 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,112
110% 897 Pts
64-Core 1,333
82% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Device(1E50 8043) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 151
Parallax 214
100% 163 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 144
Splatting 180
140% 170 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 111%
Great: 118%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Onexplayer Q5 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFM11.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2540
Write 4,132
Mixed 3,274
748% 3,315 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 84.8
272% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,712
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 1,550
1,072% 1,355 MB/s
ONE XPLA YER Q1 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: 0214
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 536
Write 531
Mixed 524
119% 530 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 27.1
101% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 137
101% 132 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
160% Outstanding
MC Read 53.1
MC Write 71.7
MC Mixed 49.9
166% 58.2 GB/s
SC Read 46.2
SC Write 62.9
SC Mixed 57.1
158% 55.4 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 160%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 201 55 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7003 SAMSUNG
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback