Notebook V54x_6x_TU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemNotebook V54x_6x_TU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook V54x_6x_TU
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 21:06
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 18 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 39.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 237
73% 141 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 698
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics
Clevo(1558 A743) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5126
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 30.4
9% 17.1 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 23.8
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT1000P3 1TB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR413 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,823
Write 3,788
Mixed 2,257
593% 2,623 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 81.8
276% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,101
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 822
639% 886 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 451%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
44GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 67
Mixed 67.8
99% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.8
117% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO516F82-4800J 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 273
15% 273 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 16" 1280 720 AUOF49A
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $377WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback