MSI MS-1585

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Katana 15 B12VGK
MotherboardMSI MS-1585  (all builds)
Memory37 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240126
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 23:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 65.1
1-Core 183
2-Core 352
103% 200 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 966
102% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,264
78% 1,264 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13C7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 187
Parallax 180
133% 177 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 150
Splatting 119
132% 168 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 126%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT4000P 4TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 524 1348 1198 1424 1593 1562 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 112
Write 228
Mixed 147
SusWrite 1,275
102% 440 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 3.6
35% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 290
206% 261 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX64GX5M2A4800C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 44.7
151% 53 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 27.8
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 136%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 45 100 31.5" 1280 720 GSM776E LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical MS-1585 Builds (Compare 1,524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-1585

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback