Corsair VOYAGER a1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCorsair VOYAGER a1600  (all builds)
MotherboardCorsair Voyager a1600
Memory55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 01:14
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 156
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 500
46% 384 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1CFA 0004) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.14058.8002
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 51.1
Parallax 66.6
37% 54.4 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 42.7
Splatting 27.8
26% 31.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00A00 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1890 1781 1848 2076 2116 2105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 2,165
Write 2,129
Mixed 2,003
SusWrite 1,969
466% 2,067 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 63.1
204% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 689
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 590
427% 560 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 295%
Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX64GX5M2A4800C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 44.6
123% 43 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 28.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 49 60 16" 1680 979 BOE0A3B
Typical VOYAGER a1600 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Corsair VOYAGER a1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback