Today's hottest deals

Samsung 750XGK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 750XGK  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750XGK-KG2IN
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 21:16
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core 5 120U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 24.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 239
65% 132 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 604
58% 477 Pts
64-Core 837
52% 837 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1D9) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 19.2
15% 19.5 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 16.4
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D512 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV22002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1403 1396 1438 1163 459 452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,528
Write 1,399
Mixed 1147
SusWrite 1,052
288% 1,281 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 30.5
142% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 722
DQ Mixed 768
605% 847 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 207%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AB-MGCL 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 57.4
MC Mixed 49.9
144% 50.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 123%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 8 60 15.5" 1280 720 STAAFC9
Typical 750XGK Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 750XGK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback