Today's hottest deals

Samsung 750QGK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 750QGK  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750QGK-KG2UK
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240226
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 02 '24 at 22:02
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core 7 150U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 34.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 260
70% 142 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 622
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics
Sanyo(144D C894) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 26.1
18% 25.5 fps
MRender 23.6
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 20.8
21% 26.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D512 512GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV22002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,546
Write 1,352
Mixed 1,104
297% 1,334 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 21.6
138% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,146
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 749
607% 869 MB/s
Poor: 155% Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
138% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 68.7
MC Mixed 52.2
161% 56.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 19.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 138%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 22 60 15.5" 1536 793 SDC4159
Typical 750QGK Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 750QGK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback