Today's hottest deals

One-netbook ONEXPLAYER 2 ARP23

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemOne-netbook ONEXPLAYER 2 ARP23  (all builds)
MotherboardONE-NETBOOK ONEXPLAYER 2 ARP23
Memory1.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 18:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 120
54% 89.8 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 513
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.20.10
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 53.3
14% 37 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 18.2
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ONE XPLAYER Q1 1TB
528GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.5E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2106 797 339 381 371 341 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,457
Write 2,282
Mixed 1,689
SusWrite 722
348% 1,537 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 51.5
180% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 613
DQ Write 455
DQ Mixed 242
260% 437 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 182%
Great: 331%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 32.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 230
17% 230 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 8.4" 1280 720 BOE1003 FLQ8423-24L0
Typical ONEXPLAYER 2 ARP23 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: One-netbook ONEXPLAYER 2 ARP23

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback