Today's hottest deals

One-netbook ONEXPLAYER Mini Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemOne-netbook ONEXPLAYER Mini Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardONE-NETBOOK ONEXPLAYER Mini Pro
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1080 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJul 05 '23 at 17:26
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 67.4
1-Core 170
2-Core 335
99% 191 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 1,014
101% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,193
74% 1,193 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 48
Parallax 62.9
29% 48.7 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 25.6
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ONE XPLAYER Q1 1TB
631GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.M0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1881 2116 2162 2386 2411 2352 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 1,669
Write 2,533
Mixed 1,708
SusWrite 2,218
461% 2,032 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 69.4
264% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 234
406% 798 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 331%
Great: 331%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 35.9
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 29.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONEXPLAYER Mini Pro Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: One-netbook ONEXPLAYER Mini Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback