Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory44 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateMar 09 '24 at 10:21
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$194
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 208
2-Core 415
119% 233 Pts
4-Core 733
8-Core 1,174
117% 954 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 124
Parallax 125
112% 129 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 106
Splatting 92
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 148 149 152 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 500
Write 150
Mixed 148
SusWrite 148
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 28.9
129% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 162
142% 217 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 128%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 171 169 166 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 113
Write 147
Mixed 114
SusWrite 169
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
340% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 103%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 151 153 152 151 153 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
8.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 189 188 189 186 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 198
Mixed 198
SusWrite 188
267% 195 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 1.2
392% 7.43 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 8.4
DQ Mixed 1.6
343% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 CMK32GX5M2B5600Z40 CMK32GX5M2B5600C36 CMK32GX5M2B5600Z40 64GB
4800, 4800, 4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
125% Outstanding
MC Read 45.9
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 42.6
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 45.2
SC Write 46.6
SC Mixed 45.2
130% 45.7 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 5% 64 168 1 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback