Today's hottest deals

MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 266%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 316%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics237% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive480% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E16
MotherboardMSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)  (all builds)
Memory57.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '24 at 07:48
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$450
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 73.2
1-Core 217
2-Core 437
123% 242 Pts
4-Core 842
8-Core 1,598
145% 1,220 Pts
64-Core 2,780
172% 2,780 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
MSI(1462 5201) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
237% Outstanding
Lighting 307
Reflection 426
Parallax 593
250% 442 fps
MRender 451
Gravity 235
Splatting 436
310% 374 fps
Poor: 158%
This bench: 237%
Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ZP1000GM30004 1TB
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SUESR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1479 4183 4765 1159 1164 1133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
480% Outstanding
Read 5,326
Write 4,909
Mixed 2,884
SusWrite 2314
862% 3,858 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 72.9
229% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,791
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 1,473
1,022% 1,305 MB/s
Poor: 250%
This bench: 480%
Great: 653%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
401GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 1269 1205 1154 1020 1014 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,214
Write 1,869
Mixed 1,586
SusWrite 1,155
382% 1,706 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 55.8
180% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 1,294
DQ Mixed 1,494
976% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 256%
Great: 372%
Seagate ZP2000GM30004 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SUESR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3561 3657 3646 2996 1893 1859 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
468% Outstanding
Read 3871
Write 3,719
Mixed 2,619
SusWrite 2,935
738% 3,286 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 77.6
246% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1877
DQ Write 702
DQ Mixed 1,547
1,076% 1,375 MB/s
Poor: 437%
This bench: 468%
Great: 812%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD5U16G72C34LA 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4600 MHz
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
263% Outstanding
MC Read 202
MC Write 48.7
MC Mixed 63.3
299% 105 GB/s
SC Read 49.9
SC Write 58.7
SC Mixed 44.4
146% 51 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 110%
This bench: 263%
Great: 263%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16) Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $2,451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback