Today's hottest deals

Samsung 750XFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 750XFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750XFG-KB1HK
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 16:57
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 58
1-Core 132
2-Core 228
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 834
79% 657 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1D3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 22.1
Parallax 21.2
15% 20.5 fps
MRender 18.7
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 15.6
16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00B 512GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1262 1242 1681 451 530 402 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 914
Write 599
Mixed 412
SusWrite 928
160% 713 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 43.3
151% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 829
664% 941 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 184%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AB-MGCL 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 53
MC Mixed 43.1
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 21.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 137 30 60 15.5" 1536 793 KDB0526
Typical 750XFG Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 750XFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback