Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics215% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer SO6100
Memory52.8 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '24 at 01:09
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 218
2-Core 413
123% 237 Pts
4-Core 817
8-Core 1,502
139% 1,160 Pts
64-Core 2,748
170% 2,748 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 300A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
215% Outstanding
Lighting 298
Reflection 352
Parallax 342
243% 331 fps
MRender 444
Gravity 273
Splatting 216
243% 311 fps
Poor: 144%
This bench: 215%
Great: 243%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7801Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2685
Write 3,089
Mixed 2,926
650% 2,900 MB/s
4K Read 68.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 87
283% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,599
DQ Write 1,214
DQ Mixed 1,393
1,045% 1,402 MB/s
Poor: 225% Great: 508%
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: GXB7801Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,598
Write 3,082
Mixed 2,852
638% 2,844 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 93.5
300% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,668
DQ Write 1,286
DQ Mixed 1,453
1,093% 1,469 MB/s
Poor: 225% Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC16C2085S1SC56BD1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
184% Outstanding
MC Read 75.7
MC Write 72.5
MC Mixed 70.3
208% 72.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 48.6
SC Mixed 31.8
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 184%
Great: 184%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 16" 1280 720 BOE0B90
Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0510 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback