Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 20:51
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 36
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 161
46% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 287
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 4
3% 3.53 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 5.8
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 392
Write 281
Mixed 24.7
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 17
51% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 5.8
DQ Mixed 7.3
18% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GJN NB 8G 1600L 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 3% 33 46 24 60 23.8" 1280 720 SGT2380
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback