Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H270M-DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 17:34
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700k VH
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 605
65% 517 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 70.1
57% 73 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 70
Splatting 70.8
57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM871 2.5 7mm 256GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 280 279 282 283 278 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 439
Write 252
Mixed 206
SusWrite 278
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 37.8
127% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 228
193% 285 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88%
Great: 99%
Samsung MZ7KM480HAHP-00005 480GB
26GB free
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 440 436 468 469 465 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 436
Mixed 408
SusWrite 454
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 46.4
148% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
WD Gold 1TB (2016)-$79
612GB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 172 174 174 170 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 209
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 175
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
397% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/8G 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 KHX2400C15D4/8G 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.2% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 21.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0CCB U28E850
Typical GA-H270M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-DS3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback