Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 22:12
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 78%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 82
2-Core 179
60% 109 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 545
52% 428 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Asus(1043 863B) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 67
Parallax 61.5
53% 64.5 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 68.2
Splatting 62.7
53% 65.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 88 81 111 63 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 316
Write 76.5
Mixed 160
SusWrite 98.5
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 21.9
80% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 91.9
82% 125 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
313GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.4 7.1 4.4 4.5 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 103
Write 9.7
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 6.7
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.1% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 120 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F55 C32JG5x
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback