Insyde AlderLake

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemInsyde AlderLake  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 13:55
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-1235UL
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 158
2-Core 273
85% 162 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 366
35% 287 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 4628) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 10.2
6% 8.17 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 7.5
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0428A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,338
Write 1,313
Mixed 959
268% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 28.3
162% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 439
DQ Mixed 497
376% 507 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 96%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
574GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.6
Write 115
Mixed 75.3
122% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40S5.M4A1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 IVM5640 PL2230HS
Typical AlderLake Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Insyde AlderLake

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback