Today's hottest deals

Zebronics ZEB-NBC 5S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZebronics ZEB-NBC 5S  (all builds)
MotherboardZDJ07/08 ZDJ07/08
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230924
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 09:04
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 59.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 218
70% 131 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 684
63% 526 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1298
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 23.7
16% 22 fps
MRender 19.2
Gravity 29.2
Splatting 17.7
18% 22 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nt-1tb 2280 1TB
925GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN13109
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 353
Write 356
Mixed 346
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 11.1
50% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 245
182% 238 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
JUHOR JHD3200S2216JG 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 17.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 30 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0AF7
Typical ZEB-NBC 5S Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Zebronics ZEB-NBC 5S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback