Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 90BG004TUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90BG004TUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Bantry CRB
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 01:08
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-870K Quad Core
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 110
45% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 161
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.1% Very good
Lighting 90.1
Reflection 89
Parallax 83.8
73% 87.6 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 78
Splatting 70.9
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
X12 480GB 480GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 49 249 248 320 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 340
Write 316
Mixed 20
SusWrite 199
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 73.6
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 0.2
42% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 94%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
52GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 9.6 9.6 9.9 11 9.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 90.3
Write 51.8
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 12.2
44% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
65% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 14.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.9
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 0 64.5" 1280 720 VIZ1039 V655-H9
Typical 90BG004TUS Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90BG004TUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback