Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '23 at 00:30
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 152 57% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 485 48% 390 Pts	64-Core 476 30% 476 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140 2,413 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Asus(1043 05D9) Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.8% Poor	Lighting 9.4 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 128 8% 51.6 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 66.4 Splatting 33.7 52% 68.7 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fury 256GB 256GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: VE0R6371 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 74 94 24 22 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 302 Write 303 Mixed 277 SusWrite 59.4 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 22.3 82% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 84.1 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 123 114% 168 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 267GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 84 70 94 94 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 81.4 Write 135 Mixed 29 SusWrite 97.2 62% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3000C15-8GVRB F4-3200C16-8GVKB 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 22.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13.7 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	55	26	144	24.1"	1920 1080	SAC2400 DP

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	335x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $79Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	285x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	227x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	193x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	173x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	165x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	61x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16