Asrock AM1B-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive1.97% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock AM1B-ITX  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 02:09
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 49.4
1-Core 31
2-Core 62.5
31% 47.6 Pts
4-Core 96.3
8-Core 101
13% 98.5 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
ASRock(1849 9830) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 86GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 6.2 7.3 8.6 7.9 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 8.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 6.6
2% 8.07 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-CK0 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 30 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F52 U32J59x
Typical AM1B-ITX Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1B-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback