Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	16.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$77 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 148 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 220 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% PwrHis(1787 2014) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	7.25% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 9.04 Parallax 7.22 8% 8.49 fps	MRender 9.33 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 8.87 7% 8.21 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.25% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Richdisk device 86GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1010 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 74.7 Write 65.4 Mixed 66.4 15% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 9.15 4K Mixed 5.2 30% 8.74 MB/s	DQ Read 9.54 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 4.93 5% 8.62 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 16%
Richdisk device 376GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 13GB free Firmware: 1010 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 62.1 Write 60.2 Mixed 58.2 14% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.36 4K Write 7.61 4K Mixed 4.9 22% 6.62 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB 5,300 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	28.4% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	47x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	22x

RAM
9905471-011.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 212 samples	14x
HMT351U6AFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 25 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $119