Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 40.3 1-Core 31.2 2-Core 50.7 26% 40.7 Pts	4-Core 81.2 8-Core 94.6 11% 87.9 Pts	64-Core 94.4 6% 94.4 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 81B3) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.1% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 3.5 2% 3.47 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.1 2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 73 57 58 55 56 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.6% Poor	Read 97.6 Write 256 Mixed 223 SusWrite 81.5 38% 164 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 10.5 37% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 93.3 DQ Mixed 85.3 73% 108 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 82%
22 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1TB free Firmware: 010A SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 30 32 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 52.1 Write 29.6 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 31.5 26% 35.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.3 449% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 116%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 7,002 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.5 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
46%	27%	52	62	9	60	23.5"	1280 720	SAM0B86 S24D391

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16