Today's hottest deals

MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 13:14
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 640
66% 532 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 40
Parallax 38
30% 38.2 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 27.1
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 100 106 96 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 258
Write 149
Mixed 168
SusWrite 101
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 42.3
138% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 118
88% 116 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 73%
Fanxiang S101 512GB
86GB free
Firmware: V1021B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 113 5 4.9 158 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 457
Write 361
Mixed 195
SusWrite 57.4
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G26C16U4R.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 24.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 60 60 21.5" 1920 1017 SAM0B6B T22D390
Typical H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback