Gigabyte GA-B550I AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550I AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230718
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 16:08
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 74.5
1-Core 158
2-Core 309
96% 181 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 902
93% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 93%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 29
17% 22.6 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 21.4
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3TE7 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S20615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 66 67 53 53 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.9% Very good
Read 406
Write 210
Mixed 267
SusWrite 66.2
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 38.1
143% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 95.2
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 114
97% 138 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 28.8
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 23.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 30 34.1" 1280 720 GSM5BB9 LG HDR WFHD
Typical GA-B550I AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 3,350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550I AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $764
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback