Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics67.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 21:59
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 208
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 628
61% 501 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.5% Good
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 87.4
Parallax 85.6
72% 87.1 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 70.3
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 22 29 353 23 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Poor
Read 243
Write 50.8
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 79.7
22% 104 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 10
50% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 11.8
DQ Mixed 13.9
11% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 30%
Great: 96%
WD easystore 266A 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 266a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 26 27 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 51
Write 35
Mixed 29
SusWrite 31.4
47% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
86% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 108 59 165 24.5" 1280 720 SPT09FB Sceptre M25
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback