Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite A200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite A200  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ISKAA
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070927
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateDec 25 '17 at 21:11
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5250-$90
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 67
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 32.9
30% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 34.7
8-Core 34.8
5% 34.8 Pts
64-Core 34.6
2% 34.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Toshiba(1179 FF00) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 0.84
1% 1.97 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 2.87
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.48%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
579GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 78.1
Write 85.9
Mixed 78.2
61% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.18
64% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite A200 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback