Today's hottest deals

HP COMPAQ 8200 WLITE CONVERTIBLE MINITOW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP COMPAQ 8200 WLITE CONVERTIBLE MINITOW  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 05:54
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 172
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 326
44% 329 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 93 79 86 100 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 67
Write 67.9
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 88.4
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 69%
Promise 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 1TB
222GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 95.1
Write 49.5
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 75.4
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
170GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 87 87 90 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 86.6
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
234GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 87 87 90 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 109
Write 107
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 86.6
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
61GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 11 32 28 14 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 43.5
Write 13
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 21.1
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback