Acer Nitro N50-640

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

7 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Acer Nitro N50-640 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Nitro N50-640
Memory	0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '23 at 12:20
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12400F-$133 48,886 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 64.6 1-Core 155 2-Core 281 88% 167 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 818 79% 651 Pts	64-Core 957 59% 957 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.5% Average	Lighting 52.4 Reflection 54.3 Parallax 46.6 43% 51.1 fps	MRender 41.5 Gravity 47.3 Splatting 43.8 36% 44.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB 1,589 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0S03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 155 257 288 287 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 220 Write 468 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 258 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 8.2 23% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 215%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 98GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 38 39 39 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 35.1 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 39 24% 32 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 182% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S1MB-8 1x8GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.3 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	23"	1280 720	FUS07A7 LSL 3230T

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro N50-640 Builds (Compare 1,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Acer Nitro N50-640

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $133Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	1,604x
Core i7-12700FIntel $250Bench 109%, 19,845 samples	167x
Core i5-12400Intel $144Bench 98%, 17,352 samples	44x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	828x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	390x
GeForce RTX 3050 OEMNvidiaBench 68%, 1,798 samples	215x

SSD
KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GBNvmeBench 166%, 1,589 samples	567x
KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GBNvmeBench 158%, 2,168 samples	200x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBNvmeBench 186%, 8,325 samples	177x

RAM
4ATF1G64AZ-3G2B1 2x8GBMicronBench 88%, 267 samples	208x
ACR32D4U2S1ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 74%, 1,596 samples	150x
M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 6,792 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $383

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16