Dell PowerEdge T350

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell PowerEdge T350
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T350  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220707
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 10:39
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2374G
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.7% Above average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 198
66% 122 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 457
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
720GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 224 236 213 260 269 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST900MP0026 900GB
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KT3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 73 66 72 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST900MP0026 900GB
687GB free
Firmware: KT3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 72 66 72 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.2% Excellent
Read 233
Write 72.2
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 70.6
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.7
328% 1.9 MB/s
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 35 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 57.5
Write 26.2
Mixed 25
SusWrite 33.6
44% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 13 9 60 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback