Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210121
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 18 '23 at 17:50
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$178
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 163
2-Core 315
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 894
86% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 3751) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 188
Parallax 181
164% 190 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 142
Splatting 124
119% 149 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 139%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1665 342 226 204 274 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,523
Write 1,555
Mixed 1,556
SusWrite 483
287% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 82.3
283% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,381
DQ Write 984
DQ Mixed 1159
872% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 231%
Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 117 121 117 113 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 133
Write 154
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 118
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 90%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 142 141 141 135 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 142
Write 142
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 138
144% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
257GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 80 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 71.4
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 79.4
84% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 18.9
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 23.2
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 120 23.8" 1920 1017 MSI3BA4 MSI G241
Typical GA-B560M AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback