Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	9.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	397% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer SO690
Memory	53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221222
Uptime	17.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '23 at 03:46
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-13950HX 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 116% U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 75.8 1-Core 215 2-Core 354 114% 215 Pts	4-Core 685 8-Core 1,076 109% 881 Pts	64-Core 1,931 120% 1,931 Pts
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 121%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 3006) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3425 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	9.34% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 275 Parallax 11.7 9% 99.3 fps	MRender 14.3 Gravity 13.4 Splatting 11.5 10% 13.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.34% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 308% 262GB free (System drive) Firmware: ERA0906 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1353 3168 1830 1852 1842 1633 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	397% Outstanding	Read 4,819 Write 28.2 Mixed 40 SusWrite 1,946 366% 1,708 MB/s	4K Read 79.7 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 34.7 174% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,510 DQ Write 29.3 DQ Mixed 59.4 220% 533 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 397% Great: 427%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 34,988 User benchmarks, average bench 239% 808GB free Firmware: 3L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2131 2229 1130 1170 1123 1156 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	333% Outstanding	Read 2,217 Write 2,284 Mixed 1,719 SusWrite 1,490 433% 1,927 MB/s	4K Read 63.4 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 90.7 275% 91.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,604 DQ Write 1,418 DQ Mixed 1504 1,130% 1,509 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑ This bench: 333% Great: 329%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x31.5GB 521 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	MC Read 63.3 MC Write 63.2 MC Mixed 60.4 178% 62.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 45.2 SC Mixed 26.4 85% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 158%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	60	42	60	16"	1280 720	CSO1624

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 109%

UFO

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

CPU
Core i9-13950HXIntelBench 116%, 1,063 samples	156x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 8%, 10,524 samples	46x
RTX 4090 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 207%, 3,538 samples	46x
RTX 4080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 188%, 4,213 samples	35x

SSD
CA6-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 308%, 2,261 samples	95x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples	21x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $190Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	12x

RAM
HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GBHynixBench 154%, 2,113 samples	48x
M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GBSamsungBench 149%, 2,547 samples	36x
HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GBHynixBench 154%, 2,551 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16