Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

Performance Results


Gaming 210% UFO	Desktop 116% UFO	Workstation 255% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	354% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer SO690
Memory	21.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230919
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '23 at 13:19
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	QAT-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-13950HX 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 116% U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Memory 79.7 1-Core 212 2-Core 419 122% 237 Pts	4-Core 772 8-Core 1,316 127% 1,044 Pts	64-Core 3,150 195% 3,150 Pts
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 121%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop) 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 188% Device(1A58 3006) ≥ 4GB CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	191% Outstanding	Lighting 265 Reflection 285 Parallax 268 216% 273 fps	MRender 385 Gravity 223 Splatting 192 209% 267 fps
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 218%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB 21,743 User benchmarks, average bench 345% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXA7801Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1828 1847 1851 1918 1947 2001 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	354% Outstanding	Read 2,686 Write 2,150 Mixed 1,869 SusWrite 1,898 482% 2,151 MB/s	4K Read 64.1 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 64.9 243% 82.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,500 DQ Write 1,061 DQ Mixed 1,173 905% 1,245 MB/s
Poor: 192% ↑ This bench: 354% Great: 444%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB 3,703 User benchmarks, average bench 357% 1.5TB free Firmware: P9CR40A SusWrite @10s intervals: 3981 3914 4032 3919 3717 3903 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	457% Outstanding	Read 1,929 Write 3,796 Mixed 2,433 SusWrite 3,911 688% 3,017 MB/s	4K Read 55.2 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 81.3 277% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,469 DQ Write 1,042 DQ Mixed 1,272 946% 1,261 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 457% Great: 535%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB 2,113 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	MC Read 76.7 MC Write 69.7 MC Mixed 67.4 204% 71.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 48.7 SC Mixed 28 92% 32.1 GB/s	Latency 82.4 49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 179%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	63	42	240	16"	2048 1280	CSO1624

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 16 - RZ09-0483 Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 234%

UFO

Desktop 117%

UFO

Workstation 287%

UFO

System: Razer Blade 16 - RZ09-0483

CPU
Core i9-13950HXIntelBench 116%, 1,063 samples	158x

GPU
RTX 4090 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 207%, 3,538 samples	47x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 8%, 10,524 samples	46x
RTX 4080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 188%, 4,213 samples	35x

SSD
CA6-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 308%, 2,261 samples	95x
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples	22x
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 460%, 45,230 samples	12x

RAM
HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GBHynixBench 154%, 2,113 samples	49x
M425R2GA3BB0-CWMOD 2x16GBSamsungBench 149%, 2,547 samples	37x
HMCG78AGBSA095N 2x16GBHynixBench 154%, 2,551 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16