Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220727
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '23 at 17:11
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$94 3,830 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 76 1-Core 154 2-Core 306 95% 179 Pts	4-Core 567 8-Core 804 86% 685 Pts	64-Core 984 61% 984 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.1% Average	Lighting 53.6 Reflection 55.6 Parallax 51 44% 53.4 fps	MRender 63.1 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 44.7 42% 52.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S650 240GB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN10738 SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 422 437 443 414 268 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 470 Mixed 426 SusWrite 406 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 42.1 158% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 235 178% 235 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB 77,202 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.8% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 24.4 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 24.5 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	60	24.1"	1920 1200	PHL087F Philips 240B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	332x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	325x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	284x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	225x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16